Hey Ubuntu, Linux'u kötü göstermeyi bırak

Bu konuyu okuyanlar

realmanager

Profesör
Katılım
31 Ekim 2009
Mesajlar
3,927
Reaksiyon puanı
99
Puanları
0
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7600/1.html
adresimde bu isimde bir makale buldum, İngilizce yazılmış benim zamanım şu an olmadığı için çeviremeyeceğim, çevirmek isteyen(bir kısmını bile olsa olur) buraya notlar düşebilir
ben ne dediğini anladım, makaledeki görüşlere kesinlikle katılıyorum
buyrun ingilizcesini buraya yazayım


Hey Ubuntu, Stop Making Linux Look Bad

Ubuntu’s new Karmic Koala 9.10 release has been highly anticipated as the greatest release ever. In truth, it falls flat on its face in a time when Linux really needed to shine.



It’s the same old story. A new Ubuntu release, a new series of pain and frustration.
Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every 6 months, come what may. Unfortunately what most often comes is a system full of bugs, pain, anguish, wailing and gnashing of teeth - as many “early” adopters of Karmic Koala have discovered.
The problem is, Ubuntu makes Linux look bad. As more and more people make the switch to free software this is not a good thing. Linux is meant to be stable, secure, reliable.
On the other hand, Ubuntu is obviously doing a lot right. People are indeed switching to Linux, and most of these users have come from an operating system far more torturous, but what they arrive to doesn’t have to be the way it is. Indeed, it shouldn’t be that way.
You see, “With great power comes great responsibility” and now that Ubuntu is very popular it really has a responsibility to create quality products.
As usual, some things which were broken in the previous release are now fixed, but things which were working are now broken. A friend of mine has two wireless USB devices. One works on 9.04 while the other one doesn’t, which is fair enough. With 9.10 however, the one which wasn’t working now works, but the one which was working now doesn’t. Come again? It’s not the first time either. Upgrading from 8.10 to 9.04 his TV tuner cards which used to work, then stopped.
There’s gotta be a better way to do this.
With each new release comes new features, newer software, yet somehow things go backwards. Free software is supposed to improve with each new release. Take OS X, which gets faster. Cleaner. Better. Sure, they have a much smaller hardware base to work on, but it can be done. Ubuntu with the potential for thousands of developers surely can do a better job? Or at least, surely it could at least move forward??
Perhaps Ubuntu’s success is also its curse. They came to fame by making the hard things easier and as such have done great things for the Linux desktop. When you introduce components like proprietary software however, things get more complicated. Sure, Jockey (the proprietary driver manager) warns that Ubuntu “cannot improve or fix these third party drivers,” but does the average user really know what that means? All they know is that their entire (supposedly stable) Linux box hard locks each time they log out or switch users.
Personally, upgrading a recent Jaunty install to Karmic entirely broke networking on the box. Meanwhile, a fresh Kubuntu 32bit install wouldn’t boot with a broken GRUB2 configuration and booting to the Live CD then hard locked the machine. On another machine, half-way through a fresh Ubuntu 64 bit install, the video card suddenly started to display artefacts on the screen. A power off and reboot and it’s still broken. Coincidence? Maybe.
Other people experience awesome features like broken graphics, crashing installer, misconfigured boot loader, USB drives not mounting, sound not working, broken wireless, the list goes on. Upgrading is so bad that a majority of the advice is to perform a fresh install. In fact, the entire term “early adopter” refers to the fact that most experienced Ubuntu users upgrading to the latest version will always wait at least a month before doing so, in order to ensure most major bugs are fixed. Is this seriously acceptable? Is this what you expect from a Linux system? Surely this is some kind of morbid, ironic joke.
Ubuntu is starting to make dents in the commercial arena and that’s great, but do we really need fancy new features like Ubuntu One when basic functionality (that quite frankly should be solved in the 21st century) doesn’t work as expected? Isn’t Ubuntu supposed to “Just Work”™?
Don’t believe me? Just take a look at the release notes for 9.10 and read the 40 odd bugs for this “stable” operating system:

  • Boot from degraded RAID array broken
  • File system corruption with so called “large files” over 512MB
  • Hibernation unavailable with automatic partitioning
  • Kubuntu package manager does not warn about installing from unsigned package repositories
  • No USB devices work on MSI Wind netbooks, plus flickering graphics
  • No Xv support for Intel graphics
  • Samba nmbd daemon not started during boot
  • System won’t boot with converted ext4 file system
  • Ubuntu Netbook Remix missing shutdown applet
  • Ubuntu One client corrupts data
  • Wireless kill switch segfaults kernel
  • X server crashes when using a Wacom tablet
  • ..and others (plus more discovered after release).
You must be joking.
A poll on the Ubuntu forums shows just 10% of people had a flawless install. Now that’s something to be proud of! Still not convinced? Try it yourself.
They say, “What goes around comes around.” If Ubuntu doesn’t get their act together then they will be eclipsed by other distros, and rightfully so. What’s worse about all this, is that Karmic Koala had been talked up so much. “It’s a Windows 7 killer” and all that, which of course we’ve heard before. Shuttleworth boasts that he is even “looking forward” to the battle with Microsoft. In the face of Microsoft’s latest effort, just when Linux needed a knight in shining armor and a prime example of how amazing free software is we get, ah, Ubuntu. Hurrah.
Many years ago Linux was very command line focused (and still can be, thank goodness). Back then, many Windows users tried Linux and were scared off, never to try Linux again having been so deeply scarred by that initial experience. It’s happening again, except that this time many of the things which are great about Linux that are touted by the community are being destroyed. Linux is stable, it doesn’t crash. Whoops, Ubuntu just hard locked my machine. Whoops, Firefox is no longer starting up for some reason, whoops this package is now broken. Gah!
Canonical is not an open source company, they are just using free software to try and get a slice of the huge operating system market. Even so, one of Shuttleworth’s primary goals for Ubuntu is for it to be as good as OS X. With releases like Karmic Koala, they aren’t going to get there any time soon, especially when Apple is releasing excellent bug fix-only versions like Snow Leopard. Get your act together, because while Ubuntu might be gaining brave new users who have it worse on Windows, it just doesn’t cut it for experienced Linux users.
Of course these sort of issues are not limited to Ubuntu, but it certainly seems to have more than its fair share. Perhaps it’s the whole commercially driven “release on time” philosophy, or maybe there aren’t enough beta testers. Then again, Fedora has been pushing the limits more than Ubuntu recently and has introduced far more features, yet has had much more successful releases. Something is very wrong with Ubuntu’s release cycle.
Perhaps it’s just Karma, or perhaps the mascot too greatly epitomizes this release. Koalas are after all, very lazy beasts who sleep most of the time (and they don’t drink at all). Drop bears on the other hand..

Christopher Smart has been using Linux since 1999. In 2005 he created Kororaa Linux, which delivered the world's first Live CD showcasing 3D desktop effects. He also founded the MakeTheMove website, which introduces users to free software and encourages them to switch. In his spare time he enjoys writing articles on free software.


Not: Bu yazıyı yazan kişi sıradan biri değil Linux Magazine dergisindeki 1999 yılından beri Linux kullandığını editörlerden biri olduğu için ilgimi çekti
 

ulash

Doçent
Katılım
8 Nisan 2008
Mesajlar
820
Reaksiyon puanı
10
Puanları
18
Anlatmak istediği kısaca sözüm ona Stable sürüm olarak sunulan Ubuntu 9.10'da 40'a yakın sayıda bug yakaladığı ve tam da Windows7'nin de piyasaya sürüldüğünü bir zamanda bunun hoş bir durum olmadığıdır. Ayrıca Kubuntu'da da buna benzer bug ların olduğun söz ediyor. Yazar 1999'dan beri Linux kullanıyor. Kororaa Linux'un yapımcısı ki bu dağıtım dünyanın ilk 3d desktop efektli Live CD dağıtımı. Ayrıca kullanıcıları Free yazılımlara yönlendiren Makethemove websitesinin de kurucusu.
 

realmanager

Profesör
Katılım
31 Ekim 2009
Mesajlar
3,927
Reaksiyon puanı
99
Puanları
0
Ubuntu'daki oluşan hata döngülerinden or ki bahsediyor ki bu olay şu
Mesela bir hatayı kapatınca neden başka bir hata çıktığından bahsediyor
Adam delirmiş hatalardan, sadece son sürümün değil Ubuntu'nun genel hatalarından
Mesela bir önceki sürümde çalışan bir donanımın bir sonrakinde çalışmamasının nasıl mümkün olduğunu anlamaya çalışıyor
Ubuntu'nun birçok Windowsçunun gözünü korkuttuğu ve kötü tanıttığından bahsediyor
Canonical'a da biraz laf atmış
 

HapS

Profesör
Katılım
23 Ocak 2008
Mesajlar
3,350
Reaksiyon puanı
63
Puanları
48
Biz diyoruz dinlenmiyor ama elin yabancisi yazdimi daha bi kiymete biniyor nedense !

Bende bir dağitim yapayimda en azindan yazilarimin sonuna referans olarak koyar belki birileri !
 

realmanager

Profesör
Katılım
31 Ekim 2009
Mesajlar
3,927
Reaksiyon puanı
99
Puanları
0
HapS sen de dağıtım yap, seni de birileri koyar ondan emin ol hatta ben koyacam sadece buraya değil heryere
Ancak henüz dağıtım yapmadığın için konuşma!!
 

HapS

Profesör
Katılım
23 Ocak 2008
Mesajlar
3,350
Reaksiyon puanı
63
Puanları
48
haps sen de dağıtım yap, seni de birileri koyar ondan emin ol hatta ben koyacam sadece buraya değil heryere
ancak henüz dağıtım yapmadığın için konuşma!!

sana mi soracam konuşup konuşmayacağimi ? Sen mi karar verecen ne konuşup konuşmayacağima otorite sen misin bu konuda birşeyin doğruluğunu onaylamak için o şeyin uygulayicisi mi olmak gerekir ?
 

Fubiku

Asistan
Katılım
4 Kasım 2009
Mesajlar
121
Reaksiyon puanı
0
Puanları
16
Birileri kötülüyor (işine geldiği için), birileri övüyor (işine geldiği için). Ama bir gerçek var ki Linux, insanların istediği gibi olana kadar bence bu kadar övülüp göklere çıkartılmamalı. Birileri iyi yazar (işine geldiği gibi), birileri kötü yazar (işine geldiği gibi)...
 
Üst